Vintage posing

By Sheryl-Lee Kerr

slkx@hotmail.com

 

 

I have been doing a great deal of research into wine of late. The

reason for this is that I am amply suited to the task, being

exceedingly allergic to the stuff and hence ideally positioned to

drive all my friends, visiting relatives and any strangers who ask

nicely to Barossa wineries.

 

Being a self-appointed expert on the vino means first getting a

handle on the lingo. It means being able to say such things as “has a

pleasing hint of wood amidst the tinge of faint peppermint and

toast” with a straight face.

 

I have observed - because I have little else to do as designated

driver on Barossa treks but watch my kinsfolk getting more and

more rosy of cheek - that acting is a skill best utilised sober.

 

So, here - from years of listening, bored, from wine cellar corners -

comes my prized knowledge on how to do the Trust Me I Am An Expert

expression for wannabe amateur wine gurus.

 

To perfect it, imagine in your mind’s eye TV journalist Ray Martin looking at a very, very sick child. Really sick. So sick there’s probably a 1-800

donations phone number about to flash up on a screen which shows

just how much this little tacker needs us to open our hearts and wallets

to him. That look.

 

That’s the earnestness you must have on your face when you refer to

wood and marmalade and aniseed in one breath when, let’s face it,

all you’re really doing is gargling wet stuff.

 

Sometimes you may wish to pass yourself off as not merely earnest

but also as knowing. This I understand because ‘knowing’ people are never

questioned; they are deferred to like mini-celebrities.

 

People always turn to the Knowing One at a tasting and ask

timorously: “What do you think?”

 

They hang on the answer as though awaiting an utterance from the Dalai Lama.

 

All a Knowing One has to do is incline  their head a millimetre, hinting that this drop is passingly pleasing to them, and collectively more nodding than in a chook pen transpires  as everyone gushes in agreement.

 

If you think this should be you at the centre of this little cult group, then it’s easy. Picture in your mind Hypothetical host Geoffrey Robertson. That’s a sort of pained intelligentsia. Be careful when you do this. If you get it wrong you will be hastily frogmarched to the toilets by staff anticipating

your needs.

 

I am told this pseudo-intelligentsia look is particularly the

expression to adopt when sampling the bouquet. (For those not in the

know, the bouquet is what they throw at you at weddings.)

 

At times you will be expected to engage in contests with a stranger

to see who has the best expressions and the most outlandishly

ridiculous verbal descriptions while downing the wine.

 

Be warned that unless you have been practising your Ray Martin in

front of the mirror or you can sense your rival is full of bovine

byproducts, try to avoid such encounters. It will only end in

shattered egos and someone cruelly declaring you don’t know your ’93

from your ’82 and asking whether your grandma’s homemade cider has

honed your tastes. (No offence to any grandmas in the cider business

out there.)

 

Frankly, such a battle is destined for tears but if you must,

Whatever you do, try and work the words “raspberry”, “fructose”,

“toxins”, “acidic”, “marshmallow”, “axle grease” and “lemon

sorbet” into your rebuttal. Not because it will help your case but

it will sure as heck amuse that designated driver giggling in the

corner.

 

© Sheryl-Lee Kerr & The Advertiser, 22 Sep 1998.